What Will Ringworm Look Like As It Is Healing

The Great War

The world of cinema is in mourning. The World of Culture is in mourning. The world of all of us who love both is mourning the death of a great, Mario Monicelli of fighting that ended his personal heroic World War, the Great War who wanted to immortalize and honor in a wonderful film, a of the many who made, but what is most dear to me and that always excites me and touches me every time I see him again, each time seeing him, I find in it a message that is always new and the previous time I had been hiding.

In Jewish tradition, when a loved one dies, a sign of mourning take off your shoes. The

because a friend of mine explained to me jew who came to see me when my father died:

"In ancient times, have the shoes was a sign of wealth and when a loved one dies suddenly all become poorer.".

Here, I believe that we should all take off our shoes as a sign of mourning because we have all become poorer for the lack of a person who has left us, but fortunately for us has left us His Works, His testimony, His inheritance, which makes us all a little less poor.

Mario Monicelli committed suicide, throwing himself down from a window of the S. Giovanni in Rome, where he was hospitalized because of having an "incurable disease" as stated in the obituary.

did not wait for the inevitable death, were to succeed in kidnap him in their own time, not since the Black Lady, lurking behind the door, you chose the right moment to take it away.

He wanted him to decide when and how he wanted him to decide how to die, having decided how to live. In

I heard an interview some time ago said clearly, I remember perfectly the words: "I've always decided how to live, I want to decide how to die." When life is no longer worth living is right to give up. "He did

.

True to his thought, when he felt his life was no longer worth living, has terminated voluntarily and choice, adding your name to that of many others who consciously and in full awareness have made the same choice, freedom, and I think I am convinced.

I stated and I repeat, consciously and with full knowledge , because, just as a psychiatrist lot daily against the suicide of patients with depression, more frequently, but also from other diseases, such attempt or sometimes enact a suicide, determined not by a free and informed choice, but rather from the unspeakable suffering caused by disease, suffering But it is, and this makes dramatic suicide, treatable, curable, delete, temporary way.

Quite different is the case of those who do not suffer from these mental illnesses that cloud the consciousness, but in full mental integrity, and decides that the time has come for him to take leave of the world
because his life is not worth lived.

E ', in my humble opinion, the ultimate act of freedom given to man that is not free to choose to be born, at least it is free to choose to die.

If we did not read in school, read or reread the wonderful pages of the "Dialogues" of Seneca, or "Dialogues" of Plato, or the Memories "by Marco Aurelio, where much much much better than I am capable , They shy and inequitable student, expressed these concepts of human freedom.

Mario Monicelli was a gift from fate, chance, freedom to implement this determination. I consider it a blessing, a gift of life.

to others less fortunate, so lucky this was denied by the disease, or other negative circumstances.

selfishly I hope and I pray with all my heart that if I were in similar circumstances, this good fortune I was denied.

Farewell Mario Monicelli, I thank you for this last lesson of life, dying as you have wanted to, you left us. Thanks.

Domenico Mazzullo

d.mazzullo @ tiscali.it

www.studiomazzullo.com

What Will Ringworm Look Like As It Is Healing

The Great War

The world of cinema is in mourning. The World of Culture is in mourning. The world of all of us who love both is mourning the death of a great, Mario Monicelli of fighting that ended his personal heroic World War, the Great War who wanted to immortalize and honor in a wonderful film, a of the many who made, but what is most dear to me and that always excites me and touches me every time I see him again, each time seeing him, I find in it a message that is always new and the previous time I had been hiding.

In Jewish tradition, when a loved one dies, a sign of mourning take off your shoes. The

because a friend of mine explained to me jew who came to see me when my father died:

"In ancient times, have the shoes was a sign of wealth and when a loved one dies suddenly all become poorer.".

Here, I believe that we should all take off our shoes as a sign of mourning because we have all become poorer for the lack of a person who has left us, but fortunately for us has left us His Works, His testimony, His inheritance, which makes us all a little less poor.

Mario Monicelli committed suicide, throwing himself down from a window of the S. Giovanni in Rome, where he was hospitalized because of having an "incurable disease" as stated in the obituary.

did not wait for the inevitable death, were to succeed in kidnap him in their own time, not since the Black Lady, lurking behind the door, you chose the right moment to take it away.

He wanted him to decide when and how he wanted him to decide how to die, having decided how to live. In

I heard an interview some time ago said clearly, I remember perfectly the words: "I've always decided how to live, I want to decide how to die." When life is no longer worth living is right to give up. "He did

.

True to his thought, when he felt his life was no longer worth living, has terminated voluntarily and choice, adding your name to that of many others who consciously and in full awareness have made the same choice, freedom, and I think I am convinced.

I stated and I repeat, consciously and with full knowledge , because, just as a psychiatrist lot daily against the suicide of patients with depression, more frequently, but also from other diseases, such attempt or sometimes enact a suicide, determined not by a free and informed choice, but rather from the unspeakable suffering caused by disease, suffering But it is, and this makes dramatic suicide, treatable, curable, delete, temporary way.

Quite different is the case of those who do not suffer from these mental illnesses that cloud the consciousness, but in full mental integrity, and decides that the time has come for him to take leave of the world
because his life is not worth lived.

E ', in my humble opinion, the ultimate act of freedom given to man that is not free to choose to be born, at least it is free to choose to die.

If we did not read in school, read or reread the wonderful pages of the "Dialogues" of Seneca, or "Dialogues" of Plato, or the Memories "by Marco Aurelio, where much much much better than I am capable , They shy and inequitable student, expressed these concepts of human freedom.

Mario Monicelli was a gift from fate, chance, freedom to implement this determination. I consider it a blessing, a gift of life.

to others less fortunate, so lucky this was denied by the disease, or other negative circumstances.

selfishly I hope and I pray with all my heart that if I were in similar circumstances, this good fortune I was denied.

Farewell Mario Monicelli, I thank you for this last lesson of life, dying as you have wanted to, you left us. Thanks.

Domenico Mazzullo

d.mazzullo @ tiscali.it

www.studiomazzullo.com

My Sister Wearing Stockings

Fennel

"Fennel " .

Fennel is the derogatory term, one of many, by which, especially appealed to my Rome are gay people, but perhaps few know what it is to be attributed to this term.

In times not so far away, the Church used to burn homosexuals, guilty of being "against nature", but graciously attentive to the pleasure and enjoyment of those who were present at these shows uplifting and not to disturb their sense of smell, with the nauseating smell of burnt human flesh, along with bundles of wood which was set on fire purification, were added to the fags, so burning, cover with their smell the nauseating stench that emanated from the fires.

Now the fires are gone, fennel, real ones, are eaten on the table, but the Church's attitude is not changed at all against gay people.

To emphasize this concept came the latest statements of our Pope in his book-length interview " Light of the world," already the subject of our attention about condoms and their use allowed in very exceptional cases.
Pope-thought on the subject of homosexuality can be summed up and explained: Homosexual persons must be respected and should not be discriminated against, but homosexuality remains something that is against the nature of what God originally intended and is not compatible with the priesthood.

few clear, categorical concepts leaving no room for doubt and do not open any window of opportunity to a healthy debate. Ipse dixit.

But do not give rise to doubt a misinterpretation, or worse, a victim of prejudice and partisan interpretation, let me back in full quotation marks, the words of the Holy Father:

" An account is the fact that they are people with their problems and their joys and to which, as people are due respect, people should not be discriminated against because they have those tendencies.

Respect for the person is absolutely crucial and decisive.

Yet the deep meaning of sexuality is another.

One might say, wanting to express in these words, that evolution has created sexuality for the purpose of reproduction.

This is also true from a theological viewpoint. The sense of sexuality is to lead man and woman, each other and thereby providing humanity offspring, children, the future.

Everything else is against the deeper meaning of sexuality. And this even though we must remain faithful to our age do not like. This is the profound truth of what sexuality means in the structure of the human being.

If someone deep-seated homosexual tendencies, though in all cases these trends have a certain power over that particular person, then this is a great test for him as a person may have to bear further testing.

But why homosexuality becomes morally right, but remains something that is against the nature of what God originally intended. "

Homosexuality is incompatible with the priesthood because otherwise even celibacy as a waiver does not make sense. It would be a great danger if the reason to start to become celibate priesthood people do not want to get married anyway, because ultimately also their attitude towards man and woman is somehow altered..

Forgive me for the license that he wanted to bring the songs in full highlights of the Pope's speech, but only a full reading can, in my opinion, give an account of some concepts that are not my interpretation, but an objective fact.

First the Pope, after a benign condescension towards people, that must be respected as persons (but why would not they? ) forget or conveniently omits to mention, that the Church which now heads, has not complied with these people, burned at the stake, along with the heretics, witches, those who wanted simply exercising their free speech.

But it is water under the bridge, of which there is no need to mention.

Behind this, however, only apparent magnanimity reveals a strong and rigidly homophobic attitude which the Church has never given up and the words of its leader are an example.

Subject to compliance with the discourse on gay people, for which we agree, we must agree, the thought of the Pope, is complicated, in my opinion, in succeeding, in terms of logical consistency, I do not know theology, which says the Pope to be a genius and a scholar.

While, as the Pope says, it is true that "the evolution created sexuality to reproduction and sense of sexuality is to lead man and woman to each other and thereby bring to humanity offspring, children, the future, " although, as always, the Pope asserts that " if someone has some deep-seated homosexual tendencies, whether in any case, these trends have a certain power over that particular person, then this is a great test for him as a person may have to bear other evidence," then they are logically forced to conclude that these homosexual tendencies, as a great test those waters, and are not a free choice of whom are my creator and manager, but a misfortune that happened to me in the head and neck, an accident, a twist of fate.

The Pope then I must logically demonstrate and explain the meaning of his next statement: "But not for this homosexuality becomes morally right, but remains something that is against the nature of what God originally intended."

If homosexuality is a big clue that I had to have to endure, and then I'm not responsible, then why my homosexuality can not become morally right?

Again, if homosexuality " remains something that is against the nature of what God had originally wanted," then let me ask you again to the Pope, evidently, he said, knows very well the will of God, whether in its opinion on homosexuality in question is due to an oversight, for a moment of inattention to God, to an involuntary execution error, or construction for which the product was finally different from the original project.

even more tortuous and logically incomprehensible, it is the Holy Father's speech about homosexuality and the priesthood. In fact, the Pope said: " Homosexuality is incompatible with the priesthood, because otherwise even celibacy as a waiver does not make sense."

In other words, if I including the homosexual who became a priest, the vocation to celibacy, that the renunciation of marriage with a woman, in reality not a true waiver as homosexual and therefore not eager to marry a woman, then there would be merit in his resignation.

reasoning specious and deceitful, a worthy man of the church, which does not take account of a small, insignificant particular, namely that the vocation to celibacy is to be understood as a renunciation of vocation to active expression of their sexuality and marriage .

Unfortunately I do not think that the Pope never melt my doubts by answering my questions.

Domenico Mazzullo

d.mazzullo @ tiscali.it

www.studiomazzullo.com

My Sister Wearing Stockings

Fennel

"Fennel " .

Fennel is the derogatory term, one of many, by which, especially appealed to my Rome are gay people, but perhaps few know what it is to be attributed to this term.

In times not so far away, the Church used to burn homosexuals, guilty of being "against nature", but graciously attentive to the pleasure and enjoyment of those who were present at these shows uplifting and not to disturb their sense of smell, with the nauseating smell of burnt human flesh, along with bundles of wood which was set on fire purification, were added to the fags, so burning, cover with their smell the nauseating stench that emanated from the fires.

Now the fires are gone, fennel, real ones, are eaten on the table, but the Church's attitude is not changed at all against gay people.

To emphasize this concept came the latest statements of our Pope in his book-length interview " Light of the world," already the subject of our attention about condoms and their use allowed in very exceptional cases.
Pope-thought on the subject of homosexuality can be summed up and explained: Homosexual persons must be respected and should not be discriminated against, but homosexuality remains something that is against the nature of what God originally intended and is not compatible with the priesthood.

few clear, categorical concepts leaving no room for doubt and do not open any window of opportunity to a healthy debate. Ipse dixit.

But do not give rise to doubt a misinterpretation, or worse, a victim of prejudice and partisan interpretation, let me back in full quotation marks, the words of the Holy Father:

" An account is the fact that they are people with their problems and their joys and to which, as people are due respect, people should not be discriminated against because they have those tendencies.

Respect for the person is absolutely crucial and decisive.

Yet the deep meaning of sexuality is another.

One might say, wanting to express in these words, that evolution has created sexuality for the purpose of reproduction.

This is also true from a theological viewpoint. The sense of sexuality is to lead man and woman, each other and thereby providing humanity offspring, children, the future.

Everything else is against the deeper meaning of sexuality. And this even though we must remain faithful to our age do not like. This is the profound truth of what sexuality means in the structure of the human being.

If someone deep-seated homosexual tendencies, though in all cases these trends have a certain power over that particular person, then this is a great test for him as a person may have to bear further testing.

But why homosexuality becomes morally right, but remains something that is against the nature of what God originally intended. "

Homosexuality is incompatible with the priesthood because otherwise even celibacy as a waiver does not make sense. It would be a great danger if the reason to start to become celibate priesthood people do not want to get married anyway, because ultimately also their attitude towards man and woman is somehow altered..

Forgive me for the license that he wanted to bring the songs in full highlights of the Pope's speech, but only a full reading can, in my opinion, give an account of some concepts that are not my interpretation, but an objective fact.

First the Pope, after a benign condescension towards people, that must be respected as persons (but why would not they? ) forget or conveniently omits to mention, that the Church which now heads, has not complied with these people, burned at the stake, along with the heretics, witches, those who wanted simply exercising their free speech.

But it is water under the bridge, of which there is no need to mention.

Behind this, however, only apparent magnanimity reveals a strong and rigidly homophobic attitude which the Church has never given up and the words of its leader are an example.

Subject to compliance with the discourse on gay people, for which we agree, we must agree, the thought of the Pope, is complicated, in my opinion, in succeeding, in terms of logical consistency, I do not know theology, which says the Pope to be a genius and a scholar.

While, as the Pope says, it is true that "the evolution created sexuality to reproduction and sense of sexuality is to lead man and woman to each other and thereby bring to humanity offspring, children, the future, " although, as always, the Pope asserts that " if someone has some deep-seated homosexual tendencies, whether in any case, these trends have a certain power over that particular person, then this is a great test for him as a person may have to bear other evidence," then they are logically forced to conclude that these homosexual tendencies, as a great test those waters, and are not a free choice of whom are my creator and manager, but a misfortune that happened to me in the head and neck, an accident, a twist of fate.

The Pope then I must logically demonstrate and explain the meaning of his next statement: "But not for this homosexuality becomes morally right, but remains something that is against the nature of what God originally intended."

If homosexuality is a big clue that I had to have to endure, and then I'm not responsible, then why my homosexuality can not become morally right?

Again, if homosexuality " remains something that is against the nature of what God had originally wanted," then let me ask you again to the Pope, evidently, he said, knows very well the will of God, whether in its opinion on homosexuality in question is due to an oversight, for a moment of inattention to God, to an involuntary execution error, or construction for which the product was finally different from the original project.

even more tortuous and logically incomprehensible, it is the Holy Father's speech about homosexuality and the priesthood. In fact, the Pope said: " Homosexuality is incompatible with the priesthood, because otherwise even celibacy as a waiver does not make sense."

In other words, if I including the homosexual who became a priest, the vocation to celibacy, that the renunciation of marriage with a woman, in reality not a true waiver as homosexual and therefore not eager to marry a woman, then there would be merit in his resignation.

reasoning specious and deceitful, a worthy man of the church, which does not take account of a small, insignificant particular, namely that the vocation to celibacy is to be understood as a renunciation of vocation to active expression of their sexuality and marriage .

Unfortunately I do not think that the Pope never melt my doubts by answering my questions.

Domenico Mazzullo

d.mazzullo @ tiscali.it

www.studiomazzullo.com

Port Royale 2 Multiplayer Mode

countermand Companions

"countermand Companions," rectification, "counter-Christian." With the same apodictic authority, with which they were given directives to the base of the party and then the new thought, is mandatory for all, with the same authority, which derives from his infallibility papal infallibility proclaimed by Pius IX mutu its aftermath the breach of Porta Pia, the present Pope Benedict XVI, has changed its opinion about the condom, condom alias until now strictly forbidden by the Church and only last year held by the same Pope useless, indeed dangerous as a means of protection and safeguard from infection of AIDS.

We all remember the echo of indignant protest provoked by the words of the pope during his trip to Africa last year alone, when with little diplomatic attention, but most of all human expressed in these terms.

But changing opinion, when we deem it appropriate, wise, brave and is a sign of great moral stature and intelligence.

For this salute with joy and enthusiasm shown by the Pope's grand opening and expressed by his words about condoms:

After careful and thorough scientific studies and theology, we know that the Pope is a great expert on the science of theology, Benedict XVI made this radical change, encapsulated in those few, thin, simple, illuminating words: "To focus only on condoms mean to trivialize sexuality banalizzzione and this is precisely the reason why so many dangerous and many people do not see sexuality as an expression of their love, but only a sort of drugs that are administered by itself. There may be justified in individual cases, such as when a prostitute using a condom and this may be the first step towards an ethical, a primary responsibility to develop a new awareness of the fact that not everything is allowed and that you can not do anything you want. However, this is not the only real way to win the infection of HIV. It 's really needed a humanization of sexuality. ".

proanthocyanidins While not religious, I thank the Pope for this courageous stance that marks a new path for the Church in sexuality that melts and Catholics from all anxiety and doubt moral problems, but I also believe they can interpret the signs and feelings of filial gratitude on the part of all prostitutes so paternally taken into account by the Holy Father's attention to their health, but especially that of their clients.

Unfortunately, it is a especially irrelevant that some may reasonably to have escaped the Pope thus engaged, the transmission of HIV is only partly due to relationships so-called mercenaries, and is tied for the most part, not just casual relationships, not protected by ignorance, carelessness, to challenge, especially in young people, for poverty, as happens in African countries.

nevertheless still remains valid and the concept already expressed in Africa, that condoms, but then why there is so determined to call it that, is not the way to win the infection of HIV. But one can not have everything in life ....

And Pope Ratzinger was considered a conservative! Rehabilitation of Galileo Galilei dates back only a few years ago, when Pope John Paul II has officially stated that perhaps the great scientist was right and that between him and the Church there had been some "misunderstandings" now outdated. By virtue of this Earth is now free to turn around right around the Sun

Perhaps the same "misunderstanding" occurred against Giordano Bruno, of the many heretics burned at the stake by the Inquisition, homosexuals they also burnt alive , women accused of witchcraft. But it's been a long time ...

Americans have forgiven the Japanese for Pearl Harbor, the Japanese have forgiven the Americans for Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and we would not want to forgive the Church for acts that occurred long ago?

Domenico Mazzullo

d.mazzullo @ tiscali.it

http://www.studiomazzullo.com/

Port Royale 2 Multiplayer Mode

countermand Companions

"countermand Companions," rectification, "counter-Christian." With the same apodictic authority, with which they were given directives to the base of the party and then the new thought, is mandatory for all, with the same authority, which derives from his infallibility papal infallibility proclaimed by Pius IX mutu its aftermath the breach of Porta Pia, the present Pope Benedict XVI, has changed its opinion about the condom, condom alias until now strictly forbidden by the Church and only last year held by the same Pope useless, indeed dangerous as a means of protection and safeguard from infection of AIDS.

We all remember the echo of indignant protest provoked by the words of the pope during his trip to Africa last year alone, when with little diplomatic attention, but most of all human expressed in these terms.

But changing opinion, when we deem it appropriate, wise, brave and is a sign of great moral stature and intelligence.

For this salute with joy and enthusiasm shown by the Pope's grand opening and expressed by his words about condoms:

After careful and thorough scientific studies and theology, we know that the Pope is a great expert on the science of theology, Benedict XVI made this radical change, encapsulated in those few, thin, simple, illuminating words: "To focus only on condoms mean to trivialize sexuality banalizzzione and this is precisely the reason why so many dangerous and many people do not see sexuality as an expression of their love, but only a sort of drugs that are administered by itself. There may be justified in individual cases, such as when a prostitute using a condom and this may be the first step towards an ethical, a primary responsibility to develop a new awareness of the fact that not everything is allowed and that you can not do anything you want. However, this is not the only real way to win the infection of HIV. It 's really needed a humanization of sexuality. ".

proanthocyanidins While not religious, I thank the Pope for this courageous stance that marks a new path for the Church in sexuality that melts and Catholics from all anxiety and doubt moral problems, but I also believe they can interpret the signs and feelings of filial gratitude on the part of all prostitutes so paternally taken into account by the Holy Father's attention to their health, but especially that of their clients.

Unfortunately, it is a especially irrelevant that some may reasonably to have escaped the Pope thus engaged, the transmission of HIV is only partly due to relationships so-called mercenaries, and is tied for the most part, not just casual relationships, not protected by ignorance, carelessness, to challenge, especially in young people, for poverty, as happens in African countries.

nevertheless still remains valid and the concept already expressed in Africa, that condoms, but then why there is so determined to call it that, is not the way to win the infection of HIV. But one can not have everything in life ....

And Pope Ratzinger was considered a conservative! Rehabilitation of Galileo Galilei dates back only a few years ago, when Pope John Paul II has officially stated that perhaps the great scientist was right and that between him and the Church there had been some "misunderstandings" now outdated. By virtue of this Earth is now free to turn around right around the Sun

Perhaps the same "misunderstanding" occurred against Giordano Bruno, of the many heretics burned at the stake by the Inquisition, homosexuals they also burnt alive , women accused of witchcraft. But it's been a long time ...

Americans have forgiven the Japanese for Pearl Harbor, the Japanese have forgiven the Americans for Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and we would not want to forgive the Church for acts that occurred long ago?

Domenico Mazzullo

d.mazzullo @ tiscali.it

http://www.studiomazzullo.com/

Square Plastic Containers

sanitation workers strike: still wrangling

continue the controversy on Tuesday after the strike by garbage collectors santantonesi for non-payment of monthly installment in October by "Geoambiente.
lawyer John Pappalardo, a spokesman for "Geoambiente" intended to clarify the situation in a statement: "The Geoambiente has a claim by the municipality of Aci S. Antonio amounting to € 691,000 and the last payment received covers only part of July "
" Yet - Pappas still the same - the company has already managed to pay all salaries up to next month September 2010. Then on the meeting with the mayor should be noted that Geo Environment was present with their attorney and their representatives promptly at 10 am in City Hall and waited in vain at the door of the office of mayor until 10.50 am.
argues vehemently about the Deputy Mayor Stefano Finocchiaro, this Monday morning at City Hall along with the UGL union Santo Gangemi.
"As stated by Geoambiente absolutely does not correspond with the facts - says Finocchiaro - together with the commissioner and the union Licciardello Gangemi we were waiting in the office of mayor he came a few representative Geoambiente that, instead, never arrived, we are saddened because the hours between 9.15 and 12.15 did not show absolutely no one and we discussed the dispute with the only Gangemi workers. Gangemi conenoi was absolutely disappointed by the absence of firm Geoambiente. We are really outraged by the statements of the company in that regard. "
On the issue of debt due by the first citizen Pippo Cutuli has thus said: "We paid all the bills until the month of July - he says - are missing the months of August, September and October, but we are still within the limits of agreement, so much so that so far there are not even the invoices submitted by the company. We are making many sacrifices to raise due to the invoices that will be presented and can not understand why our good work to be frustrated in this way, I just do not understand. "

Square Plastic Containers

sanitation workers strike: still wrangling

continue the controversy on Tuesday after the strike by garbage collectors santantonesi for non-payment of monthly installment in October by "Geoambiente.
lawyer John Pappalardo, a spokesman for "Geoambiente" intended to clarify the situation in a statement: "The Geoambiente has a claim by the municipality of Aci S. Antonio amounting to € 691,000 and the last payment received covers only part of July "
" Yet - Pappas still the same - the company has already managed to pay all salaries up to next month September 2010. Then on the meeting with the mayor should be noted that Geo Environment was present with their attorney and their representatives promptly at 10 am in City Hall and waited in vain at the door of the office of mayor until 10.50 am.
argues vehemently about the Deputy Mayor Stefano Finocchiaro, this Monday morning at City Hall along with the UGL union Santo Gangemi.
"As stated by Geoambiente absolutely does not correspond with the facts - says Finocchiaro - together with the commissioner and the union Licciardello Gangemi we were waiting in the office of mayor he came a few representative Geoambiente that, instead, never arrived, we are saddened because the hours between 9.15 and 12.15 did not show absolutely no one and we discussed the dispute with the only Gangemi workers. Gangemi conenoi was absolutely disappointed by the absence of firm Geoambiente. We are really outraged by the statements of the company in that regard. "
On the issue of debt due by the first citizen Pippo Cutuli has thus said: "We paid all the bills until the month of July - he says - are missing the months of August, September and October, but we are still within the limits of agreement, so much so that so far there are not even the invoices submitted by the company. We are making many sacrifices to raise due to the invoices that will be presented and can not understand why our good work to be frustrated in this way, I just do not understand. "

Milena.velba.in.supermarket

TARSU: Appeal upheld!

Etc or what you read on the site of CittAtt iva: APPLICATION ACCEPTED!

The TA R Catania has expressed s body nza d el 16/11/2010 on Appeal presented by the group against PD-CITTATTIVA The determination with which the mayor and his council Cutuli have placed the ' TARSU fare increase for 2008 . The answer to the bench permanently the merits of the appeal has upheld and annulled the contested measures. immediate consequence of the Judgement, the santantonesi right of citizens to obtain a refund for wrongly paid tax on junk for the year 2008, approximately 25% of the total . The councilors PD-CittAttiva : Santo Caruso, Pippo D'A gata and Joseph Micallef, together with CITTATTIVA coordinator, dr. Giuseppe Rocca, and coordinator of the Democratic Party, Maria Grazia Leone, say great satisfaction with the achievement: "We got a result rewards our trust in the organs of administrative justice that we chose to appeal against a decision we thought was illegal and abusive. "We urge the administration santantonese to take inspiration from this lesson in democracy and fairness and administrative to treasure of this ruling. "We hope that the mayor and his council to have done so - AUTOMATIC - the incumbent refunds to citizens, relinquishing any obstructions attitude statistical , which would only further damage the santantonesi, more than they have been harassed and damaged by the payment of a fee exorbitant, unjust and illegitimate. "The memories came Cutuli santantonesi to represent the people and their duty to its mandate and avoid heavy and make it more difficult to obtain because, for right now is for them."

Congratulations to the team Cittattiva, for the result.

Aci S. Antonio area!

Milena.velba.in.supermarket

TARSU: Appeal upheld!

Etc or what you read on the site of CittAtt iva: APPLICATION ACCEPTED!

The TA R Catania has expressed s body nza d el 16/11/2010 on Appeal presented by the group against PD-CITTATTIVA The determination with which the mayor and his council Cutuli have placed the ' TARSU fare increase for 2008 . The answer to the bench permanently the merits of the appeal has upheld and annulled the contested measures. immediate consequence of the Judgement, the santantonesi right of citizens to obtain a refund for wrongly paid tax on junk for the year 2008, approximately 25% of the total . The councilors PD-CittAttiva : Santo Caruso, Pippo D'A gata and Joseph Micallef, together with CITTATTIVA coordinator, dr. Giuseppe Rocca, and coordinator of the Democratic Party, Maria Grazia Leone, say great satisfaction with the achievement: "We got a result rewards our trust in the organs of administrative justice that we chose to appeal against a decision we thought was illegal and abusive. "We urge the administration santantonese to take inspiration from this lesson in democracy and fairness and administrative to treasure of this ruling. "We hope that the mayor and his council to have done so - AUTOMATIC - the incumbent refunds to citizens, relinquishing any obstructions attitude statistical , which would only further damage the santantonesi, more than they have been harassed and damaged by the payment of a fee exorbitant, unjust and illegitimate. "The memories came Cutuli santantonesi to represent the people and their duty to its mandate and avoid heavy and make it more difficult to obtain because, for right now is for them."

Congratulations to the team Cittattiva, for the result.

Aci S. Antonio area!

Smashbox Or Makeup Forever Foundation

A Case of Conscience


Accustomed as we are, to read in the newspapers or see worse on television news and images, often gruesome and unnecessary violent deaths of men at the hands of other men, it seems that without one or more deaths, no corpses in plain sight, for the macabre enjoyment of the spectators, the news is not news, is not worthy of being published and disseminated. For this reason I was
today, very impressed, I'd say impressed by the emphasis that some newspapers, including the ones I read, have an event ended without casualties, without bloodshed, but that makes us think that almost forces us to reflect and take a stand as human beings belonging to this community, forces us to put our conscience and to propose a question, a question of a doubt, that only in our hearts and in solitude with ourselves, we can try to solve.
The fact is recent, but does not belong to our country, so unfortunately accustomed to medical malpractice who see doctors for suspected non-compliance, for incompetence, for fatal carelessness towards the poor patients, but occurred in Germany, Padenborn a city of the western region of North Rhine-Westphalia.
a hospital patient, a man of 36 years had already been anesthetized. But when the surgeon was preparing to perform the surgery has seen the tattoo emblazoned on the biceps (the classic eagle sitting on a swastika symbol of Nazism) was pulled back. Literally. He took off the mask from his face, he stripped the green gown and left the operating room, praying another surgeon present for him to operate the patient.
Outside, in a waiting room sat the wife of the patient. The quarantaseienne surgeon turned directly with a few, but unequivocal words : "I did not draw her husband, lady, I can not, because they are jew, my conscience will not let me .." The other surgeon has taken its place, the operation was performed with a happy outcome, the patient is doing well.
followed the article in the newspaper comment of a journalist, I always read that, I respect and admire you for your courage and your clarity, Fiamma Nirenstein, are obvious, such as revealing his name, Jewish origins.
journalist, while I understand the reasons for the surgeon and catching them in extenuating circumstances, it stigmatizes the work entitled to comment the article "made a mistake by a physician and jew. Saving lives comes first" synthesizing with these words His mind then widely expressed.
As a physician, instinctively and without thinking, I was initially supportive of the thoughts of the journalist, as clearly and logically expressed, considering that my jew-German colleague had failed to doctors and for us is sacred and inviolable, the Oath of Hippocrates that obliges us to provide our care to those in need of our work, regardless of any other evaluation of a personal nature, whatever it is, no ifs, ands or buts.
E 'extreme and obvious, for example, the case where a doctor is forced into war to carry out his work of aid against enemies or friends, if they are in case of need.
Equally imperative is the imperative for every physician to render assistance immediately and spontaneously to those who need it and was in danger. Still remaining
this inalienable and indisputable principle, however, reflecting calmly and freeing time and emotion from the immediate reading of the story has provoked in me, I was forced to revise my position completely reversing my deduction.
First, in this case was not depicted the situation of extreme urgency and emergency and a state of necessity, being the patient in the hospital and above all there was a different surgeon can take the place of the doctor who gave up to work and then to take patient care.
Very different would be the case in which the surgeon jew was the only one capable of working, or the only doctor present and available, taking shape in such a hypothetical situation a state of absolute necessity, that absolutely would not allow the doctor to escape their duty.
But the explanation of the work of the surgeon, who refused to work is all in his own words, in the few lapidary words he addressed to the wife of his patient: "I did not draw a her husband, lady, I can not, because are jew, my conscience will not let me. "
Attention, the doctor said "I do not want " but said " I can not " and added" my conscience will not let me. " What conscience? a jew? a doctor or do both?
The key to understanding the work of the doctor is all that his " I can not ".
Every doctor knows this and must always remember that when it is not in a condition of absolute necessity, as I stated earlier, if his condition is psychological and physical, that are not likely to offer the patient the best of himself or his abilities and skills are not likely to make him feel adequate to the task, must waives his profession to the patient.
In this particular case it was not course of professional skills, being a doctor, a surgeon ready to operate, but rather a psychological and emotional situation, which has been created at the time of observation, the jew doctor, his patient to be a neo-Nazi.
I can easily imagine how the doctor could not have felt quite free and free of emotion and mood disturbances, feelings understandable and easy to imagine that they could make, according to his conscience, not shiny and perfectly suitable for a delicate task which preparing and realizing this, right and proper, has decided not to work, assigning the patient to another surgeon.
Ben would have been different if he had been the only surgeon in order to operate.
In such circumstances the doctor, with all its troubles, was forced from his duty, to operate.
upsetting circumstances is the same reason why most doctors refuse to give up or take care of their families, just because they do not feel free from emotional involvement with them, that make them shiny and obiettvi in \u200b\u200bdiagnosis and therapy possible.
I realize that all these may, or may seem academic discourse and perhaps unnecessary, since then everything has been resolved positively. Maybe I am, so maybe think those who had the patience to read this far, but not for me, and especially for me man physician, which are a necessity, a cause for reflection, analysis, and of course also of self-criticism, self-censorship.
But one last thought comes to me from the episode and is in addition to the many findings, the topic given to me several times, the personal and professional experience.
often and it happened to me, as I said in this last occasion, we express opinions and evaluations in the wake of emotions and passions, emotional moods, and judgments that need not stop there, but absolutely under assessment and the critique of our reason, which unfortunately often leads to conclusions diametrically opposed to the first formula, creating within us a conflict difficult to resolve between feeling and reason. But
feeling and reason are really two aspects of our psyche, one against the other armies? E 'within us that can never develop a daily struggle between the two? Or is it not true that both the two functions are necessary for our existence and strive with things, but above all different times, to lead us to an opinion on the reality that surrounds us?
The feeling in fact, broadly construed, leads us to conclusions quickly, but necessarily imprecise.
The reason for the slower, allows us to make judgments later, but certainly more accurate and detailed '. One has
then the speed advantage in the conclusions, the other for greater accuracy. Perhaps if we were able to use both tools, achieve better results.
I would like to conclude on this subject, with the words of a great psychiatrist of the early years of last century, Kurt Schneider, who I consider my teacher, although he died when I was just born, but having studied and understood all hope His books include:
"A man who was just feeling, it would still be a man. A man who was just reason, is no longer a man."
Thanks for letting me read to date.
Domenico Mazzullo
d.mazzullo @ tiscali.it
www.studiomazzullo.com

Smashbox Or Makeup Forever Foundation

A Case of Conscience


Accustomed as we are, to read in the newspapers or see worse on television news and images, often gruesome and unnecessary violent deaths of men at the hands of other men, it seems that without one or more deaths, no corpses in plain sight, for the macabre enjoyment of the spectators, the news is not news, is not worthy of being published and disseminated. For this reason I was
today, very impressed, I'd say impressed by the emphasis that some newspapers, including the ones I read, have an event ended without casualties, without bloodshed, but that makes us think that almost forces us to reflect and take a stand as human beings belonging to this community, forces us to put our conscience and to propose a question, a question of a doubt, that only in our hearts and in solitude with ourselves, we can try to solve.
The fact is recent, but does not belong to our country, so unfortunately accustomed to medical malpractice who see doctors for suspected non-compliance, for incompetence, for fatal carelessness towards the poor patients, but occurred in Germany, Padenborn a city of the western region of North Rhine-Westphalia.
a hospital patient, a man of 36 years had already been anesthetized. But when the surgeon was preparing to perform the surgery has seen the tattoo emblazoned on the biceps (the classic eagle sitting on a swastika symbol of Nazism) was pulled back. Literally. He took off the mask from his face, he stripped the green gown and left the operating room, praying another surgeon present for him to operate the patient.
Outside, in a waiting room sat the wife of the patient. The quarantaseienne surgeon turned directly with a few, but unequivocal words : "I did not draw her husband, lady, I can not, because they are jew, my conscience will not let me .." The other surgeon has taken its place, the operation was performed with a happy outcome, the patient is doing well.
followed the article in the newspaper comment of a journalist, I always read that, I respect and admire you for your courage and your clarity, Fiamma Nirenstein, are obvious, such as revealing his name, Jewish origins.
journalist, while I understand the reasons for the surgeon and catching them in extenuating circumstances, it stigmatizes the work entitled to comment the article "made a mistake by a physician and jew. Saving lives comes first" synthesizing with these words His mind then widely expressed.
As a physician, instinctively and without thinking, I was initially supportive of the thoughts of the journalist, as clearly and logically expressed, considering that my jew-German colleague had failed to doctors and for us is sacred and inviolable, the Oath of Hippocrates that obliges us to provide our care to those in need of our work, regardless of any other evaluation of a personal nature, whatever it is, no ifs, ands or buts.
E 'extreme and obvious, for example, the case where a doctor is forced into war to carry out his work of aid against enemies or friends, if they are in case of need.
Equally imperative is the imperative for every physician to render assistance immediately and spontaneously to those who need it and was in danger. Still remaining
this inalienable and indisputable principle, however, reflecting calmly and freeing time and emotion from the immediate reading of the story has provoked in me, I was forced to revise my position completely reversing my deduction.
First, in this case was not depicted the situation of extreme urgency and emergency and a state of necessity, being the patient in the hospital and above all there was a different surgeon can take the place of the doctor who gave up to work and then to take patient care.
Very different would be the case in which the surgeon jew was the only one capable of working, or the only doctor present and available, taking shape in such a hypothetical situation a state of absolute necessity, that absolutely would not allow the doctor to escape their duty.
But the explanation of the work of the surgeon, who refused to work is all in his own words, in the few lapidary words he addressed to the wife of his patient: "I did not draw a her husband, lady, I can not, because are jew, my conscience will not let me. "
Attention, the doctor said "I do not want " but said " I can not " and added" my conscience will not let me. " What conscience? a jew? a doctor or do both?
The key to understanding the work of the doctor is all that his " I can not ".
Every doctor knows this and must always remember that when it is not in a condition of absolute necessity, as I stated earlier, if his condition is psychological and physical, that are not likely to offer the patient the best of himself or his abilities and skills are not likely to make him feel adequate to the task, must waives his profession to the patient.
In this particular case it was not course of professional skills, being a doctor, a surgeon ready to operate, but rather a psychological and emotional situation, which has been created at the time of observation, the jew doctor, his patient to be a neo-Nazi.
I can easily imagine how the doctor could not have felt quite free and free of emotion and mood disturbances, feelings understandable and easy to imagine that they could make, according to his conscience, not shiny and perfectly suitable for a delicate task which preparing and realizing this, right and proper, has decided not to work, assigning the patient to another surgeon.
Ben would have been different if he had been the only surgeon in order to operate.
In such circumstances the doctor, with all its troubles, was forced from his duty, to operate.
upsetting circumstances is the same reason why most doctors refuse to give up or take care of their families, just because they do not feel free from emotional involvement with them, that make them shiny and obiettvi in \u200b\u200bdiagnosis and therapy possible.
I realize that all these may, or may seem academic discourse and perhaps unnecessary, since then everything has been resolved positively. Maybe I am, so maybe think those who had the patience to read this far, but not for me, and especially for me man physician, which are a necessity, a cause for reflection, analysis, and of course also of self-criticism, self-censorship.
But one last thought comes to me from the episode and is in addition to the many findings, the topic given to me several times, the personal and professional experience.
often and it happened to me, as I said in this last occasion, we express opinions and evaluations in the wake of emotions and passions, emotional moods, and judgments that need not stop there, but absolutely under assessment and the critique of our reason, which unfortunately often leads to conclusions diametrically opposed to the first formula, creating within us a conflict difficult to resolve between feeling and reason. But
feeling and reason are really two aspects of our psyche, one against the other armies? E 'within us that can never develop a daily struggle between the two? Or is it not true that both the two functions are necessary for our existence and strive with things, but above all different times, to lead us to an opinion on the reality that surrounds us?
The feeling in fact, broadly construed, leads us to conclusions quickly, but necessarily imprecise.
The reason for the slower, allows us to make judgments later, but certainly more accurate and detailed '. One has
then the speed advantage in the conclusions, the other for greater accuracy. Perhaps if we were able to use both tools, achieve better results.
I would like to conclude on this subject, with the words of a great psychiatrist of the early years of last century, Kurt Schneider, who I consider my teacher, although he died when I was just born, but having studied and understood all hope His books include:
"A man who was just feeling, it would still be a man. A man who was just reason, is no longer a man."
Thanks for letting me read to date.
Domenico Mazzullo
d.mazzullo @ tiscali.it
www.studiomazzullo.com

Cost To Airbrush A Motorcycle

Young

Young

E 'is a commonplace, accepted, tested and worn by time, consider the young generation in decline, even before reaching full maturity, the decline in age, should unfortunately happen physiologically and hopefully slowly and without pain.
and I think I got to see that this is an everyday concept in every age and preserve its young generation that is no longer seen and the generation that follows and presses closely, as less valid, less prepared, less culturally equipped less animated by the usual "good will" that I have not understood what and where it is. It was a
concept I've heard when I was a boy, the people who were above me, like age, as you deserve, as experience, as a role, as the hierarchy and now I find myself I also support having reached an age where certain concepts are expressed duty for generations, if not out of conviction and experience.
Accustomed as they are, good luck and I hope to continue to be always asking me to debate, to question the validity of what I think and I say, what I believe and trust, my values \u200b\u200band my ideals and to what it I am able, I think I could still be considered young, I have often under the scrutiny of my own and personal critique of this concept, this observation, this belief, namely that new generations are no better in some respects, than the previous ones, but rather, if possible, worse, or less valid, less prepared and less adequate to meet the challenges and above all the tasks that life submit the same to us and offers us free.
Unfortunately the screen, as I said, my severe criticism, has always confirmed this feeling, this feeling, this finding, facilitated in this task by my being a psychiatrist, and then contact, by choice and passion, with real-life difficulties , there is no need to call them diseases, the various generations.
I've never been happy with this acquisition, in fact I sincerely say that I was always deeply saddened and distressed, for two reasons, one social and one personal.
The first and most serious of course, is easily explained and readily understood: if a society is such that the younger generation, those that must necessarily and inevitably pass the baton from the hands of those who preceded them, are not better, more prepared, stronger and more aware, more mature, more adequate than before that the "witness" must leave, then inevitably that society is in decline, decline all the more dizzying the more obvious is the phenomenon pejorative from generation to generation.
The second reason is more private and personal, though certainly less serious and compelling to others: if I was a kid I listened with some bored enough and this talk about the past, even better, by large, already considered old and overtaken them and now I think they also and above all I, then I must irrevocably assume that the mature and maybe old age has also reached me.
All this until yesterday, when, as in St. Paul on the Damascus parade in front of me was a novel, unexpectedly and happily reassuring, which has dispelled at a stroke, my sad thoughts.
Yesterday, for the third time I attended as a guest transmission, the TV show "Studio 254 Show" that the students of the Academy of Cesare Lanza Studio 254 to stage and that is aired on TV Gold Italy.
know the Academy to have seen her birth and have taught you, I know the boys had to have them as students of my boring classes, but for the first time I saw them all work in the construction of a television program under the guidance, caring, but not bulky Cesare Lanza.
At the end of the program, I bade farewell to them with a strange feeling, with a particular emotion, with a new taste in the mouth that only later, with the passage of time and closed at a new-found solitude I could fully appreciate, understand, rationalize, analyze, realize, and now record and transmit.
I tried to feel the sweet taste bitter belied by the facts, to verify, to touch, to have to humbly admit, I was wrong, he had misunderstood, that he bad read and interpreted to have misunderstood the reality in my dark and gloomy, pessimistic forecasts.
is clear proof of my error evaluation was right there in front of me, clear, clear, visible and immediately grasped, in his explicit inescapable reality.
The test was in those guys, those students in those persons, belonging to a later generation to mine, and that they undertook, fighting, who is passionate, who suffered the wrong, trying to learn, they wanted to achieve a result, achieve a goal, a dream come true, they wanted to work hard to achieve it, they wanted to dream.
I was not entirely clear when I was with them in their midst.
I needed to collect my thoughts in solitude, to rethink and tidy up the emotions felt, to see the slow motion memory the faces, expressions, anxieties, fears and suffering also, of those kids who dream and are committed to realize a dream. Only
alone I could draw my own conclusions, I could gather the emotions and feelings in a completed and coherent thought, rational and communicable.
E 'false and only for us more mature reassuring and comforting to think, believe, be convinced that new generations are less mature, less willing, less willing to sacrifice than they were earlier ones.
I'm happy to admit that they have so far wrong. Yesterday I saw a girl
Academy weep hot tears, desperate because he could not sing a good song, his song. I was moved. I was moved.
and I am convinced that as long as children continue to exist as humanity's future is safe and secured.
thank Cesare Lanza wanted and created this Academy, I thank the guys who make it up for providing me the opportunity to think again, for giving me the opportunity to admit you were wrong.

Domenico Mazzullo

Cost To Airbrush A Motorcycle

Young

Young

E 'is a commonplace, accepted, tested and worn by time, consider the young generation in decline, even before reaching full maturity, the decline in age, should unfortunately happen physiologically and hopefully slowly and without pain.
and I think I got to see that this is an everyday concept in every age and preserve its young generation that is no longer seen and the generation that follows and presses closely, as less valid, less prepared, less culturally equipped less animated by the usual "good will" that I have not understood what and where it is. It was a
concept I've heard when I was a boy, the people who were above me, like age, as you deserve, as experience, as a role, as the hierarchy and now I find myself I also support having reached an age where certain concepts are expressed duty for generations, if not out of conviction and experience.
Accustomed as they are, good luck and I hope to continue to be always asking me to debate, to question the validity of what I think and I say, what I believe and trust, my values \u200b\u200band my ideals and to what it I am able, I think I could still be considered young, I have often under the scrutiny of my own and personal critique of this concept, this observation, this belief, namely that new generations are no better in some respects, than the previous ones, but rather, if possible, worse, or less valid, less prepared and less adequate to meet the challenges and above all the tasks that life submit the same to us and offers us free.
Unfortunately the screen, as I said, my severe criticism, has always confirmed this feeling, this feeling, this finding, facilitated in this task by my being a psychiatrist, and then contact, by choice and passion, with real-life difficulties , there is no need to call them diseases, the various generations.
I've never been happy with this acquisition, in fact I sincerely say that I was always deeply saddened and distressed, for two reasons, one social and one personal.
The first and most serious of course, is easily explained and readily understood: if a society is such that the younger generation, those that must necessarily and inevitably pass the baton from the hands of those who preceded them, are not better, more prepared, stronger and more aware, more mature, more adequate than before that the "witness" must leave, then inevitably that society is in decline, decline all the more dizzying the more obvious is the phenomenon pejorative from generation to generation.
The second reason is more private and personal, though certainly less serious and compelling to others: if I was a kid I listened with some bored enough and this talk about the past, even better, by large, already considered old and overtaken them and now I think they also and above all I, then I must irrevocably assume that the mature and maybe old age has also reached me.
All this until yesterday, when, as in St. Paul on the Damascus parade in front of me was a novel, unexpectedly and happily reassuring, which has dispelled at a stroke, my sad thoughts.
Yesterday, for the third time I attended as a guest transmission, the TV show "Studio 254 Show" that the students of the Academy of Cesare Lanza Studio 254 to stage and that is aired on TV Gold Italy.
know the Academy to have seen her birth and have taught you, I know the boys had to have them as students of my boring classes, but for the first time I saw them all work in the construction of a television program under the guidance, caring, but not bulky Cesare Lanza.
At the end of the program, I bade farewell to them with a strange feeling, with a particular emotion, with a new taste in the mouth that only later, with the passage of time and closed at a new-found solitude I could fully appreciate, understand, rationalize, analyze, realize, and now record and transmit.
I tried to feel the sweet taste bitter belied by the facts, to verify, to touch, to have to humbly admit, I was wrong, he had misunderstood, that he bad read and interpreted to have misunderstood the reality in my dark and gloomy, pessimistic forecasts.
is clear proof of my error evaluation was right there in front of me, clear, clear, visible and immediately grasped, in his explicit inescapable reality.
The test was in those guys, those students in those persons, belonging to a later generation to mine, and that they undertook, fighting, who is passionate, who suffered the wrong, trying to learn, they wanted to achieve a result, achieve a goal, a dream come true, they wanted to work hard to achieve it, they wanted to dream.
I was not entirely clear when I was with them in their midst.
I needed to collect my thoughts in solitude, to rethink and tidy up the emotions felt, to see the slow motion memory the faces, expressions, anxieties, fears and suffering also, of those kids who dream and are committed to realize a dream. Only
alone I could draw my own conclusions, I could gather the emotions and feelings in a completed and coherent thought, rational and communicable.
E 'false and only for us more mature reassuring and comforting to think, believe, be convinced that new generations are less mature, less willing, less willing to sacrifice than they were earlier ones.
I'm happy to admit that they have so far wrong. Yesterday I saw a girl
Academy weep hot tears, desperate because he could not sing a good song, his song. I was moved. I was moved.
and I am convinced that as long as children continue to exist as humanity's future is safe and secured.
thank Cesare Lanza wanted and created this Academy, I thank the guys who make it up for providing me the opportunity to think again, for giving me the opportunity to admit you were wrong.

Domenico Mazzullo